and now a word from our sponsor: Anxiety Management

Dear Friends,

Here’s a post I made on another board. It occurred to me as I was writing it that it serves the purpose of the note that I said I might post here about the shift in focus of this blog. It’s also a way of reintroducing that foundational theme, since I’m sure I’ll have occasion to visit it again from time to time.

All the best to all of you,
M.
————————————————————-
Dear J,

Have any of us known paralyzing anxiety? I have. I do still, although it’s much more manageable once one learns to recognize it for what it is rather than for any of the many disguises it can take.

You are lucky – yes, that is a considered judgment – to recognize the anxiety, to know at least some of its sources, and to be working with a therapist you describe as “gifted” on furthering your recognition and management.

I have spoken twice of management because this is not, in my experience, something that goes away, is outgrown, or gets cured or fixed. I hasten to add that, paradoxically if you like, paying focused attention to it as appropriate frees one to go on living without being in thrall to it.

I’ve found it helpful lately to think of my anxiety (or neurosis, as it was known in my youth) as a given, like being male, American, Caucasian, or having been raised Catholic. There’s nothing I can do to change those facts, or in the case of the anxiety to change the facts that caused or precipitated it, but I can place those facts in a larger context and go on living my life without it being overdetermined by any of them (all of which create some tension in my life about who I am and want to be).

Realizing there was a new way of looking at my givens was part of my decision to abandon the first focus of the blog that I had begun as an adjunct to my current therapy – which is going well, thanks for asking. ;^) (The older, anxiety-specific posts run from February through May).

None of this is meant to minimize the reality of your childhood hardships, J, much less the bravery and underlying good heart and good judgment that kept you sane and functioning in a crazy-making situation. The task now – or the series of tasks – is to continue to honor and respect that courage and good heart, and even your childhood choices, as you come to terms with the fact of those choices and their consequences no longer being suited to the kind of life you want and need to live.

As always, you know how to reach me if you’d like to discuss these things further. I’m not sure it works, but I think I’ve enabled comments in my blog, so you’re welcome to try to respond there if you’re so moved.

Love,
M.

suffer the little children: no baptism if parents are gay

A Roman Catholic cardinal says children of gay parents cannot be baptized.

OK, it seems to me that the mind of anyone who is at all familiar with the gospels turns immediately to:
————
And they brought young children to him, that he should touch them: and [his] disciples rebuked those that brought [them]. But when Jesus saw [it], he was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
(Mark 10:13-15)
————
Well, looks like some of today’s would-be disciples are still in the rebuking business.

“Suffer the little children”, indeed! “Forbid them not”…unless you don’t like what their parents are doing or saying.

Best to all,
M.

p.s. As you might suppose, in general I would oppose infant baptism in the first place. But practically speaking, having been raised Catholic, I know that if any of these kids are allowed into Catholic schools, their not being baptized will just be one more damn thing they shouldn’t have to deal with.

Zach’s father speaks out

Well, damned if I ever thought I’d post a link to the Christian Broadcasting Network, but Joe Stark, father of Zach (yes, that’s his real name, apparently), is defending his parental choices there.

Best to all,
M.

man beats 3-year-old son to death because “he might be gay”

Thought Toddler Gay, Dad Kills Son
by Fidel Ortega 365Gay.com Miami Bureau

Posted: July 14, 2005 12:01 am ET
©365Gay.com 2005

(Tampa, Florida) A 21 year old Tampa man is charged with murder after his 3-year old son was pummeled into unconsciousness and then died.

Ronnie Paris Jr. went on trial for his own life this week in a Tampa courtroom. The toddler’s mother, Nysheerah Paris, testified that her husband thought the boy might be gay and would force him to box.

Nysheerah Paris told the court that Paris would make the boy fight with him, slapping the child in the head until he cried or wet himself. She said that on one occasion Paris slammed the child against a wall because he was vomiting.

The court was told there had been a history of abuse by Paris. Prosecutor Jalal Harb said that in 2002, the Florida Department of Children & Families placed the child in protective custody after he had been admitted to the hospital several times for vomiting.

He was returned to his parents Dec. 14. A month later he went into a coma and was rushed to hospital. Six days later he was removed from life support and died. An autopsy showed there was swelling on both sides of his brain.

“He was trying to teach him how to fight,” Nysheerah Paris’ sister, Shanita Powell told the court. “He was concerned that the child might be gay.”

Following the child’s death Tampa police Detective Anthony Zambito thought there was something suspicious. He testified that he questioned both parents closely at the hospital. But it wasn’t until investigators questioned them separately Feb. 1 that the boy’s mother talked about the abuse.

Paris was charged with capital murder and Nysheerah Paris was charged with felony child neglect and faces a maximum of 15 years in prison.

edit, 7/15/05: The trial was short, and Ronnie Paris, Jr., was convicted of second-degree murder.

a broadside for “Zach”

The protest around these sexual suppression programs for teens, as galvanized and personified by “Zach”, continues in the vein of charmingly naive.

Best to all,
M.

Tennessee still investigating Love in Action

OK, here’s a bit of an update on Love in Action. The state of Tennessee is continuing to scrutinize the program, now on the basis of whether they are purporting to provide professional counseling services, and if so whether the services are effective and/or need to be licensed, as reported in The Washington Blade.

The article also discusses the debate over “reparative therapy”, and how even some of its advocates advise against imposing it on teenagers, on grounds of both effectiveness and ethics.

Some issues actually most germane to “Zach’s” case are discussed at the end of the article:

Shannon Mintner, a lawyer with the National Center for Lesbian Rights, has worked on hundreds of cases in which teens are forced into various types of treatment scenarios because their parents disapprove of their sexual orientation.

Mintner first became aware of this phenomenon when he was contacted by a teenage girl who had escaped from a psychiatric facility where she was undergoing forced treatment for lesbianism. Mintner was able to help the girl find an adoptive home with a San Francisco lesbian couple.

Mintner said that Love in Action’s attempt to reorient kids is unique only in that they are so open about what they are trying to do.

In 1995, Mintner was involved in a case in Memphis in which the group Parents & Friends of Lesbians & Gays helped a 16-year-old gay male seek emancipation from his parents because they were forcing him to attend reorientation counseling with a Memphis psychologist, Dr. Duff Wright, and planned to send him to either Love in Action, or another similar program.

Minter said that the Memphis Circuit Court judge agreed that the boy would be harmed by this treatment and indicated that he would sign the emancipation order. In a settlement agreement, the parents abandoned plans to send the boy to reorientation treatment.

In April, the Tennessee Department of Health permanently revoked Dr. Duff Wright’s license to practice as a psychologist, due to alleged ethics violations.

Mintner said that while he has been able to help young people on a case-by-case level, “What we have not yet been able to find a way to do is to develop a systemic response that would get at the heart of the issue.”

Discussion of Love in Action has permeated the Memphis media in recent weeks and Alex Polotsky of the Queer Action Coalition said that the group will continue its campaign of demonstrations against Love in Action.

“We want every person in America to know about this. No reasonable sane person would support this program,” he said.

Twenty-one-year-old J.M., who spoke on condition on anonymity, said that he was sent to Love in Action by his parents at the recommendation of a Christian counselor when he was 17.

“The place was like a Nazi camp. I lost faith in God, friends, family.”

J.M. said he is glad that Love in Action has come into the spotlight.

“I am optimistic for some point in the future, I’ve lived for brief periods in New York, New Jersey, Philly. They are not as close-minded about this; it is not as cruel,” he said.